Business Week posted an interesting article about increased competition facing for-profit education providers in 2006. It reinforces the point I made in my post Traditional Schools Moving Online, that when traditional schools with local brand equity move online, for-profits will have difficulty competing.
The article quotes Signal Hill Capital analyst Trace Urdan. "Nonprofits have begun to employ the student acquisition techniques of the for-profit universe, further crowding the field of student recruiters. Urdan warns this isn't good news for Apollo Group Inc., and expects traditional schools that have strength in certain niche areas to "peck away" at Apollo's market share in 2007."
"People that might have gone to the University of Phoenix are now going elsewhere," Urdan says. "Apollo's approach of being 'all things to all people' was the right approach when the market was brand new."
The article also references the lower price of traditional schools, echoing my post Room for a Value Play in Online Education. Citibank analyst Paul Beland states: "Nothing beats in-state tuitions at traditional publics, which for an online degree can be 20 percent of the cost."
It's a tough slog ahead in my industry: a great deal of creativity and gumption will be required to create operating models that are sustainable and profitable as market competition continues to increase rapidly.